Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Test Policy
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-25 03:41:32
Robert Ramey <ramey <at> rrsd.com> writes:
> Actually this can be a big problem. I was having trouble
> testing on my own machine and in the trunk because boost.test
> was being worked on while I was using it. So I moved to
> lightweight test so that I would be dealing with only one
> thing at a time.
I do not believe this is *big* problem. Boost.Test is rather stable
in a last couple years. You should be very unlucky to intersect with
my update phase.
> Now, I run all my local tests against the release branch of
> all the libraries not my own.
This is a good practice in any case and avoids any possibility of
issues like above.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk