Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Towards a Warning free code policy proposal
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-31 02:33:07


----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrey Semashev" <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 4:46 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] Towards a Warning free code policy proposal

>
> On 08/30/2010 11:14 PM, vicente.botet wrote:
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrey
>> Semashev"<andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> To:<boost_at_[hidden]> Sent:
>> Monday, August 30, 2010 6:51 PM Subject: Re: [boost] Towards a
>> Warning free code policy proposal
>>
>>
>>> On the original topic: * I don't think that adding the ability to
>>> mask out all Boost warnings is of much use.
>> <snip>
>>> That's why I don't think that adding the policy is a good idea for
>>> Boost in general. However, particular library developers may offer
>>> this feature of their own libraries, on their free will.
>>
>>
>> Andrey,
>>
>> If I can recall the original topic, what I proposed is something you
>> already do in quite a lot of files in Boost.Expression.
>
> Um... I'm not a maintainer of Boost.Exception. I believe, Emil is the
> library maintainer.

Sorry for the mistake. I started to don't understand at all your arguments.

Sorry again,
Vicente


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk