Re: [boost] De Bruijn Bind (alternate bind syntax) Interest?

Subject: Re: [boost] De Bruijn Bind (alternate bind syntax) Interest?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-02 16:20:20

At Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:41:35 -0400,
David Sankel wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:10 PM, David Sankel <camior_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > > On the other hand, arg seems pretty reasonable.
> >
> > and how is _1  different from arg<0>?
> >
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean here. var (or arg if you like) in this library
> takes two template arguments.

Sorry, typo.  I meant arrrrgh.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com