Subject: Re: [boost] Towards a Warning free code policy proposal
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-02 18:35:24
On 2 September 2010 11:20, Daniel James <dnljms_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Personally, I wouldn't use a table for the
> data, it crams too much into a small space. I'd just use a separate
> page for each compiler.
Here's an example of what I mean.
Note that the warnings are listed on the right for quick access (this
is automatically done from the headers). If you like it, I'll copy and
reformat the rest of the warnings. Although I'm not sure if a
definition list is the best way to lay out the details.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk