Subject: Re: [boost] Scalpel: a Spirit&Wave-powered C++ source code analysis library
From: Klaim (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-08 04:54:16
> Or red underline, like a spell checker. And blue underline like MS
> Word for "grammar" (syntax) errors. You get the idea. Might as well
> do real spell checking (against dictionary and code identifiers) in
> the comments as well...
AFAIK MS Visual Studio 2010 do that for C++ now. Not perfect yet but
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 09:38, Ryo IGARASHI <rigarash_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > emacs, vi, and VS only make local decisions about each symbol. You
> > ought to be able to do much better by taking in an entire file and
> > throwing out the possibilities that result in invalid parses. I know
> > this approach works for natural language, which is full of the same
> > kinds of ambiguities (homonyms/homophones). Actually the NLP case is
> > much harder because a word doesn't have to be used consistently across
> > sentences.
> FYI, there is an GCCSense project(http://cx4a.org/software/gccsense/)
> to use with emacs/vim for translation unit aware code completion.
> Best regards,
> Ryo IGARASHI, Ph.D.
> Unsubscribe & other changes: