Re: [boost] [serialization] feedback on a possible port of the XML archive grammar to Qi

Subject: Re: [boost] [serialization] feedback on a possible port of the XML archive grammar to Qi
From: Bryce Lelbach aka wash (admin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-10 13:50:48

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/10/2010 01:07 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
> OK this looks very good.  Just out of curiousity - what method
> did you use to run the tests?

I used the Boost.Regression script you mentioned ITT.

> If you have update access to the trunk, the easiest for me would
> be if you just checked them in.  And BTW, you'd get test results
> right off the test matrix.  If you don't have trunk accesss, I guess
> the best would be to send me the changed files.

I don't trunk access, I could request it if that'd be easier for you.

>> I don't think we'll see a notable speed increase (at least, not with
>> the work I've done so far). The bottleneck in the xml parser is the
>> input stream -> intermediary string -> spirit design pattern in
>> basic_xml_grammar<CharType>::my_parse.
> 
> Hmmm - how do you know this?

> a) a performance test
> b) usage of the multi-pass iterator.

Only way to find out is to do ^ a) and b), and compare the results against the
Spirit.Classic version of the XML grammar the Spirit.Qi version of the XML
grammar that uses the intermediary string.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyKb/gACgkQO/fqqIuE2t7XtACZAYZGK2tfT8jsMbx+U3Vd4cFE
w28AoJTnS5DclzJfBvdTlNTL27Hwl9Ht
=WWAu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----