Re: [boost] [constrained_value] Constrained Value review results

Subject: Re: [boost] [constrained_value] Constrained Value review results
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-11 20:57:03

On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Gordon Woodhull <gordon_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Substituting for Jeff Garland, I am pleased to present the results from the constrained_value review.

Gordon,

Many thanks for taking this on and for the thorough report.  However,
a critical piece of information seems to be missing (or buried so I
can't find it): is the library accepted?  Conditionally or
unconditionally?

Thanks,

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com