Re: [boost] Scalpel: a Spirit&Wave-powered C++ source code analysis library

Subject: Re: [boost] Scalpel: a Spirit&Wave-powered C++ source code analysis library
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-13 19:37:18

On 9/7/2010 8:08 PM, Doug Gregor wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Edward Diener<eldiener_at_[hidden]>  wrote:
>> On 9/7/2010 10:14 AM, Doug Gregor wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Brian Wood<woodbrian77_at_[hidden]>    wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Doug Gregor:
>>>>>
>>>>> I want to see great, new ideas in C++ parsing and development tools,
>>>>> but I strongly feel that those ideas could be far better disseminated
>>>>> through extending/adapting/changing existing the large-scale,
>>>>> industry-backed projects (GCC or Clang/LLVM) than by bringing up a
>>>>> third large-scale competitor.
>>>>
>>>> Years ago I looked at GCC and considered using it as
>>>> a basis for what I'm working on, but after spending a
>>>> few months working with the code, concluded it wouldn't
>>>> make a good basis for my project.  Perhaps you are being
>>>> generous about it here, but I can't recommend anyone join
>>>> that project.  I certainly hope Clang is superior to GCC in
>>>> many ways.
>>>
>>> I don't know what issues you ran into with GCC, but Boosters should be
>>> far more at home with Clang: it's a set of reusable, modern C++
>>> libraries that aim to make it easy to build development tools for
>>> C/C++/Objective-C, under a BSD-like (Boost-compatible) license. For
>>> more information, I suggest visiting
>>>
>>>    http://clang.llvm.org/
>>>
>>> or asking on the Clang mailing list.
>>
>> Any chance of putting the CLang mailing lists on GMane ?
>
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.clang.devel

I meant in a GMane NG for easier viewing/responding.