Subject: Re: [boost] [constrained_value] Constrained Value review results
From: Neal Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-14 08:44:44
Robert Kawulak wrote:
>> From: Gordon Woodhull
>> So let's walk through the items and decide which need to be addressed
>> before release.
> Thanks for the clarification, now it looks very reasonable. :)
> BTW if there are people out there who were already using the library - I'd
> be very grateful for any comments (positive or negative ;-) on how it
> works in real code.
> Best regards,
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
I'm currently using it as the basis of my fixed point work. I'm not
actively developing this, so nothing comes to mind. Everything is working
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk