Re: [boost] [function] Question on semantics of boost::function

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] Question on semantics of boost::function
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-17 18:34:03

AMDG

David Sankel wrote:
> Is a boost::function<void (int)> semantically different from
> a boost::function<void (int &)>

Yes.  The signature of a boost::function behaves
exactly the same way as the signature of a normal
function.

> or a boost::function<void (const int)>?
>   

No.  boost::function<void(int)> is the same type
as boost::function<void(const int)>.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe