Subject: Re: [boost] [guidelines] why template errors suck
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-09-27 21:30:31
On 9/27/2010 3:00 PM, Eric Niebler wrote:
> Thanks, Steven. So if I understand you correctly, you're of the opinion
> that using C++0x concepts to type-check Spirit's templates (or other
> Proto-based EDSL, or even metaprograms in general) is not going to work?
No, I don't.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk