Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: [boost] [config] additions for gcc 4.0.1 and IBM V11.1.0.0duetoMSM compile errors
From: Christophe Henry (christophe.j.henry_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-04 14:39:28

John Maddock wrote:
> The updated test is passing as well, looks like this may be a case of adding
> a BOOST_WORKAROUND for Apple's GCC and see if it fixes things.

I added some #if for Apple's gcc and the IBM compiler. A look at the
regression tests
- all problems with Apple's gcc 4.0.1 are gone (waow cool! Better than expected)
- IBM's compiler manages a few test cases more (for others, it just
crashes or gives a run-time error status 139 which does not bring me
much further)

This is in my eyes a proof that for these compilers,
be defined. If these features only work sometimes, then they should
not be seen as supported.
We now have 2 possibilities:
- we change boost.config to reflect this situation and I update my
code accordingly
- we don't and I have to keep my #if.

Solution 2 is not great for me because I'm duplicating boost.config
and it litters my code with stuff less clear than
In any case, it'd be good if we could decide on it this week on it so
that this makes it to the 1.45.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at