Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] memory use for optional refs and ptrs
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-06 08:26:30
Sebastian Redl wrote:
> On 06.10.2010 14:09, Rutger ter Borg wrote:
> > On 2010-10-06 13:11, Stewart, Robert wrote:
> >> (I haven't looked, but I do hope that the bool follows the
> >> optional value to reduce padding overhead.)
> > It doesn't, the boolean is followed by the optional value (see
> > boost/optional/optional.hpp lines 447-448).
> I really don't think it makes a difference. Unless you're using
> compiler-specific packing instructions, the size of a struct
> will always be a multiple of the largest alignment of any of its
> subobjects. In other words, no matter where you place the bool,
> it will take as much space as the alignment of the value.
When the bool follows the value, it can occupy otherwise unused padding between data members.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk