Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Ratio Library Starts TODAY
From: Bruno Santos (bsantos_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-06 11:43:40
Sorry for the late reply, yesterday was public holiday so I had a small
Seg, 2010-10-04 Ã s 22:52 +0200, vicente.botet escreveu:
> first of all, thanks for your positive review.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruno Santos" <bsantos_at_[hidden]>
> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 10:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Ratio Library Starts TODAY
> >> - What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library?
> > Very useful on my domain, which is network protocols. I have to deal
> > with all sorts of time (and other) units.
> > And of course, Boost.Chrono needs it :-)
> I'm interested in examples you could have. This can be done by private mail if you prefer.
Sure, I can give you some examples. I'm bit busy, but by the Weekend I
can post some examples. Send me a reminder if I forget.
> >> - Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems?
> > Yes. gcc, msvc and clang. No.
gcc-4.4 and latest clang-2.9svn on Ubuntu x86-64. msvc-10 x86 and x86-64
on Win7 x86-64, I not so sure about this last one because only today I
have replace the RC with the RTM version. I will give a spin of test
again to confirm this.
> Glad to hear you don't find any issues :) Please could share with us with wich compiler version and on which platforms have you used the library?
> >> - Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library?
> > Yes.
> Thanks again,
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk