Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Ratio Library Starts TODAY

Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Ratio Library Starts TODAY
From: Bruno Santos (bsantos_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-06 11:43:40

Hi,

Sorry for the late reply, yesterday was public holiday so I had a small
vacations.

Seg, 2010-10-04 Ã s 22:52 +0200, vicente.botet escreveu:
> Hi,
> 
> first of all, thanks for your positive review.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bruno Santos" <bsantos_at_[hidden]>
> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 10:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Ratio Library Starts TODAY
> 
> 
> > 
> >> - What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library?
> > 
> > Very useful on my domain, which is network protocols. I have to deal
> > with all sorts of time (and other) units.
> > And of course, Boost.Chrono needs it :-)
> 
> I'm interested in examples you could have. This can be done by private mail if you prefer.
>  

Sure, I can give you some examples. I'm bit busy, but by the Weekend I
can post some examples. Send me a reminder if I forget.

> >> - Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems?
> > 
> > Yes. gcc, msvc and clang. No.

gcc-4.4 and latest clang-2.9svn on Ubuntu x86-64. msvc-10 x86 and x86-64
on Win7 x86-64, I not so sure about this last one because only today I
have replace the RC with the RTM version. I will give a spin of test
again to confirm this.

> 
> Glad to hear you don't find any issues :) Please could share with us with wich compiler version and on which platforms have you used the library?
>  
> >> - Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library?
> > 
> > Yes.
> 
> Thanks again,
> Vicente
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost