Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Ratio Library
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-07 08:25:11

Next message: Rutger ter Borg: "Re: [boost] [optional] memory use for optional refs and ptrs"
Previous message: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [Concept Check] ContiguousIterator"
In reply to: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Ratio Library"
Next in thread: Stewart, Robert: "Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Ratio Library"

At Thu, 7 Oct 2010 07:56:40 +0200,
vicente.botet wrote:
>
> I'm voluntering to participate in this if the Boost community think
> it is the way to manage with C++0x libraries.

If boost::tr1 was popular (was it?), it seems like a good idea.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com

Next message: Rutger ter Borg: "Re: [boost] [optional] memory use for optional refs and ptrs"
Previous message: Mathias Gaunard: "Re: [boost] [Concept Check] ContiguousIterator"
In reply to: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Ratio Library"
Next in thread: Stewart, Robert: "Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Ratio Library"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk