Re: [boost] [Review] Final Few Days for Formal Review of ProposedBoost.Ratio Library

Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Final Few Days for Formal Review of ProposedBoost.Ratio Library
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-10 08:48:23

Hi,

While changing the static_gcd and other specific metafunction from the boost::detail to a specific ratio detail namespace I have see that Boost.Chrono used these detail implementation meta-function also. It seems necessary to move these details to a public namespace. I don't know which lib should be the best to include them, Boost.Math or Boost.Integer.

The nedeed metafunctions are static_signed_gcd, static_signed_lcm, static_signed_sign, static_signed_abs.

John, I have added 4 files to the sandbox/static_integer directory. Do you think that this could be included in Boost.Integer or Boost.Math if I provide the associated documentation and tests?

Best,
_____________________
Vicente Juan Botet Escribá
http://viboes.blogspot.com/