Subject: Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping and exception safety recap
From: Emil Dotchevski (emil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-11 01:01:57
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Daniel Walker
> Finally, there have been suggestions to alter boost::function's
> exception safety guarantee directly through either policies or
> constructor options.
We used to have an Allocator parameter to the boost::function template
and it was removed (just in time for this change to also be reflected
in C++0x) to reduce coupling. Adding any policies to boost::function
would undo all of the benefits of that change.
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk