Subject: Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping with no exceptionsafetyguarantee
From: Emil Dotchevski (emil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-12 14:08:39
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Daniel Walker
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:44 AM, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:19:31 -0400,
>> Daniel Walker wrote:
> swapping out throw_bad_function call does not directly address
> the boost::function/Boost.Exception coupling issue.
It could be implemented such that the dependency on
boost::throw_exception is only there if the default throwing behavior
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk