Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping with no exceptionsafetyguarantee

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping with no exceptionsafetyguarantee
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-12 16:04:41

On 12 October 2010 14:14, Daniel Walker <daniel.j.walker_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Some users who do not use RTTI (e.g. on some embedded system), do not
> want to take the time to configure Boost.Exception for their platform,
> and without configuring Boost.Exception, they get unexpected link
> errors, because boost::throw_exception is undefined.

In other words, Boost is misconfigured on their system.  What
guarantees are there for *any* Boost library to work correctly under
these circumstances?
-- 
 Nevin ":-)" Liber  <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]>  [phone]