Re: [boost] C++0x trailing return type

Subject: Re: [boost] C++0x trailing return type
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-14 10:13:09

On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Matt Calabrese <rivorus_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I'd like to introduce a macro to Boost.Config
> called BOOST_NO_TRAILING_RETURN_TYPE for checking if a compiler supports 0x
> trailing return types I.E.
>
> auto foo() -> void;
>
> Is there general agreement that this is an appropriate name for the macro?

+1

Please be sure to provide the test machinery. See http://tinyurl.com/2afubs9

Thanks,

--Beman