Subject: Re: [boost] [1.45] Beta next week?
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-15 12:52:58
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Robert Ramey wrote:
> Uhm, so we don't have a fix checked in yet? Maybe, the right solution,
> for 1.45, is to revert completely whatever patch has broken the
> backward compatibility in the first place? Folks are complaining real
> about 1.44 already -- I'd rather not see same complains about 1.45
It's not that easy. The problem isn't compatibility of the library itself
but rather compatibility with binary archives created with different past
versions. Rolling back to 1.42 would leave all binary archives
created since as unreadable.
I'll try to get this addressed this weekend.
> - Volodya
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk