Subject: Re: [boost] [Pointer Container] Modification of pointer containers to allow const elements
From: Gerardo Hernandez (g.hernandez_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-15 16:04:44
2010/10/15 John Bytheway <jbytheway+boost_at_[hidden]>:
> I presume that Scott only intended to suggest abandoning
> const-correctness in the implementation, not the interface. Thus the
> above assignment would still cause an error. Since type safety has
> already been abandoned by making all pointers void*, const-correctness
> doesn't seem much of an additional sacrifice.
I see the point. But I do not understand the advantage of using a
single underlying type instead of two (which I presume was also
Thorsten idea). Using always void* would not only require a lot of
const_cast when returning data from the containers but also think that
ptr_vector<T>::iterator must be of different type as ptr_vector<const
boost::ptr_vector<const int> v;
(*v.begin()) = 2;
shall also be compiler error, as the container contains const elements.
To sum up I think it is best to use the metafunction when
instantiating the underlying type, as the implementation is simpler.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk