Subject: Re: [boost] [phoenix] request for a mini-review. (Re: Phoenix as a Boost library)
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-16 20:42:58
On 10/17/2010 8:37 AM, Eric Niebler wrote:
> On 10/16/2010 4:41 PM, Mathias Gaunard wrote:
>> I thought V2 doesn't follow the result_of protocol,
>> and didn't do
>> perfect forwarding either.
> I don't think v3 will do perfect forwarding either. At least not with
> C++03. It's just too expensive at compile time.
Yep. It won't be perfect, but at least we can offer something better
than what we have with V2.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk