Re: [boost] Call for interest - BOOST_AUTO_FUNCTION

Subject: Re: [boost] Call for interest - BOOST_AUTO_FUNCTION
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-18 09:55:11

At Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:45:24 +0800,
Dean Michael Berris wrote:
> 
> Now say the standard doesn't get changed to support what you're
> proposing (I really hope you'll write the N**** paper so that the C++
> committee members can address your concern and the (now in hindsight)
> obvious mistake), the use case you intend to enable deserves enough
> attention.

FWIW, I seriously doubt this result is from lack of attention.  Much
more likely it's due to "implementability concerns."  Understanding
that could be important to writing a convincing paper.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com