Re: [boost] Call for interest - BOOST_AUTO_FUNCTION

Subject: Re: [boost] Call for interest - BOOST_AUTO_FUNCTION
From: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. (jhellrung_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-18 22:27:13

On 10/18/2010 6:10 PM, Matt Calabrese wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Matt Calabrese<rivorus_at_[hidden]>  wrote:
[...]
> what was "requires" is now "if"
>
> what was "requires_not" is now simply "not"
[...]

Using "if" and "not" for opposite things seems kind of awkward...maybe 
"if" and "unless" ?

I haven't been following *too* closely on this, but it does look useful.

- Jeff