Subject: Re: [boost] [1.45] Beta final schedule
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-20 10:58:46
Jim Bell wrote:
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:09:50 -0700
>> From: Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]>
>> To: boost_at_[hidden]
>> Subject: Re: [boost] [1.45] Beta final schedule
>> Message-ID: <4CBE172E.90602_at_[hidden]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>> > So far...
>>> > https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/4736
>>> > https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/4698
>>> > https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/4747
>>> > Less important, but would remove more yellow from the regression table...
>>> > https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/4735
>> Can you comment on whether these are regressions from previous releases?
> 1.44 had the first three, which is what (eventually) led me to this list
> (and pitching in to fix them).
could you please configure your mail client to put proper In-Reply-To headers.
This way, every post of yours ends up a top-level thread.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk