Re: [boost] Call for interest - BOOST_AUTO_FUNCTION

Subject: Re: [boost] Call for interest - BOOST_AUTO_FUNCTION
From: Matt Calabrese (rivorus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-20 17:17:43

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Matt Calabrese <rivorus_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Matt Calabrese <rivorus_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> All of these details can be worked out after I submit it for review, and
>> at that point, pending it even gets accepted, if there is a strong opinion
>> in one direction I will make changes, but as of right now I'd rather just
>> get back to focusing on functionality.
>>
>
> Alright, I have an interesting way to handle checking arbitrary expression
> requirements for the automatically deduced result type, but I'm not sure
> it's standard.:It's actually kind of nasty, but I think it would work and it
> also has the side-effect of allowing users to pass a series of statements,
> including declarations, to "try" and "continue try", instead of a
> preprocessor sequence of expressions (though compilers can't handle it yet).
>

It also just occurred to me that if this solution works there is no need to
separate "if" from "continue if", and "try" from "continue try".

-- 
-Matt Calabrese