Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping with noexceptionsafetyguarantee
From: Domagoj Saric (dsaritz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-23 13:43:43

"Emil Dotchevski" <emil_at_[hidden]> wrote in message

> What's the benefit of function2 vs. adding a nothrow_t constructor to
> function?

What's so different between adding more overloads to boost::function
constructors and assignment operators and adding more defaulted template

How would you, for example, make a boost::function<> use a non-default SBO
size or mark itself as nothrow using more runtime constructor parameters?

"What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, spiritual
devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than
from one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate."
Neil Postman 

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at