Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?

Subject: Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?
From: Artyom (artyomtnk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-23 17:06:40

> >
> > All you need is to compile executables with  -rdynamic
> >
> Ah. I understand now.  But does this mean that the  symbols (functions) 
> that are already resolved within my application will not  have symbolic 
> names  available for the backtrace?  My stripped  executables only seem 
> to have the undefined symbolic names present in the  executable.

Generally if you have compiled  with -rdynamic you will not see static,
anonymous namespace or inlined symbols, the rest should not be a problem.

Artyom