Subject: Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?
From: Artyom (artyomtnk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-23 17:06:40
> > All you need is to compile executables with -rdynamic
> Ah. I understand now. But does this mean that the symbols (functions)
> that are already resolved within my application will not have symbolic
> names available for the backtrace? My stripped executables only seem
> to have the undefined symbolic names present in the executable.
Generally if you have compiled with -rdynamic you will not see static,
anonymous namespace or inlined symbols, the rest should not be a problem.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk