Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?
From: Brian Wood (woodbrian77_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-25 14:08:18

Next message: Daniel Walker: "Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping with no exceptionsafetyguarantee"
Previous message: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] Report # 29 (aka 1.45 blockers) is too narrow"
Maybe in reply to: Artyom: "[boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"
Next in thread: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"
Reply: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"

On Oct 20, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Artyom wrote:
>
>
> Initial Source Code:
>
> http://art-blog.no-ip.info/files/backtrace.tar.gz
>
>
> Any interest?

I'm not able to access that link so far today. I'm getting
a server not found error.

Brian Wood
Ebenezer Enterprises
http://webEbenezer.net

Next message: Daniel Walker: "Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping with no exceptionsafetyguarantee"
Previous message: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] Report # 29 (aka 1.45 blockers) is too narrow"
Maybe in reply to: Artyom: "[boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"
Next in thread: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"
Reply: Artyom: "Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk