Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Is it time for another bug sprint? (Post 1.45 release, I mean)
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-26 14:00:16

Next message: Andy Venikov: "Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"
Previous message: Mateusz Loskot: "[boost] Seek within a file stream using large offsets - reactivation"
In reply to: Marshall Clow: "[boost] Is it time for another bug sprint? (Post 1.45 release, I mean)"
Next in thread: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] Is it time for another bug sprint? (Post 1.45 release, I mean)"
Reply: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] Is it time for another bug sprint? (Post 1.45 release, I mean)"

----- Original Message -----
From: "Marshall Clow" <mclow.lists_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 6:23 PM
Subject: [boost] Is it time for another bug sprint? (Post 1.45 release,I mean)

>
> What do people think?

+1. But I will be busy until end of Boost.Chrono review. So 15th November could be a good date.

Vicente

Next message: Andy Venikov: "Re: [boost] [Backtrace] Any interest in portable stack trace?"
Previous message: Mateusz Loskot: "[boost] Seek within a file stream using large offsets - reactivation"
In reply to: Marshall Clow: "[boost] Is it time for another bug sprint? (Post 1.45 release, I mean)"
Next in thread: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] Is it time for another bug sprint? (Post 1.45 release, I mean)"
Reply: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] Is it time for another bug sprint? (Post 1.45 release, I mean)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk