Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] spirt status?
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-27 01:35:13


Bryce Lelbach wrote:
 
> Compile [2010-10-27 01:49:54 UTC]: fail
>
> "/sierra/Sntools/extras/compilers/intel/Compiler/11.0/081/bin/intel64/icpc" -c -xc++ -O0 -g
> -w1 -inline-level=0 -fPIC -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_SERIALIZATION_DYN_LINK=1 -I".." -c
> -o
> "/scratch/boost/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/serialization/build/intel-
linux-11.0/debug/xml_wgrammar.o"
> "../libs/serialization/src/xml_wgrammar.cpp"
>
> 300 second time limit exceeded
>
> The test box is running Red Hat, and has an impressive Dual Duo-Core Intel Xeon
> (3Ghz) with 8Gb RAM. My machine is running an experimental Linux kernel built with
> Clang and full debugging symbols (not to mention my kernel was not optimized). My
> hardware is an Intel Core 2 Duo, and 2Gb RAM. I was running X, procmail and firefox
> while testing (I suspect the Red Hat server has none of those installed, much less
> running during tests). My times:
>
> wash_at_Pegasus:~/boost/status$ time icpc -c -xc++ -O0 -g -w1 -inline-level=0 -fPIC
> -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_SERIALIZATION_DYN_LINK=1 -I".." -c -o
> "/scratch/boost/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/serialization/build/intel-
linux-11.0/debug/xml_wgrammar.o"
> "../libs/serialization/src/xml_wgrammar.cpp"
>
> real 5m54.892s
> user 5m44.142s
> sys 0m1.128s
>
> I just can't imagine the Xeon being that slow, relative to my numbers...

I don't suppose Boost tests are being run on a dedicated machine...

- Volodya


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk