Subject: Re: [boost] [constrained_value] Constrained Value review results
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-29 10:45:08
On Oct 29, 2010, at 8:56 AM, "vicente.botet" <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I don't know what problems Phoenix has. Maybe we need to wait for a new library, but in the context of the Constraint library I find that all these predicates are no so hard to implement and will give a real power to the library.
I don't think they necessarily belong to this library but they would make a nice companion - constraints to go along with the constrained values...
To spell it out, I think we are talking about a set of predicates sort of like those in std:: except that one of the arguments is bound to a static value. Right?
constexpr is going to be very nice for constrained_value!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk