|
Boost :
|
- Next message: joel falcou: "Re: [boost] Best method of checking for ==, <, streamability"
- Previous message: Hartmut Kaiser: "Re: [boost] [function] new implementation"
- Next in thread: joel falcou: "Re: [boost] Best method of checking for ==, <, streamability"
- Reply: joel falcou: "Re: [boost] Best method of checking for ==, <, streamability"
- Reply: Nevin Liber: "Re: [boost] Best method of checking for ==, <, streamability"
- Reply: new.gmane.org: "Re: [boost] Best method of checking for ==, <, streamability"
- Reply: Maxim Yegorushkin: "Re: [boost] Best method of checking for ==, <, streamability"
A user recently posted on boost-users asking for operator== support in boost::any. I have added this support to my private version, which extends spirit's implementation of any. I am interested in cleaning this up and submitting it to replace boost::any, if everyone is happy with this.
The major issue is that my implementation requires type support operator==, operator< , hash and operator<< / operator>>. Are there any techniques in boost for detecting the presence of these operators which are sufficiently reliable they could be used in boost::any?
Apologises for this question, but I have lost track of how well such checks can be implemented.
Thanks,
Christopher Jefferson
- Next message: joel falcou: "Re: [boost] Best method of checking for ==, <, streamability"
- Previous message: Hartmut Kaiser: "Re: [boost] [function] new implementation"
- Next in thread: joel falcou: "Re: [boost] Best method of checking for ==, <, streamability"
- Reply: joel falcou: "Re: [boost] Best method of checking for ==, <, streamability"
- Reply: Nevin Liber: "Re: [boost] Best method of checking for ==, <, streamability"
- Reply: new.gmane.org: "Re: [boost] Best method of checking for ==, <, streamability"
- Reply: Maxim Yegorushkin: "Re: [boost] Best method of checking for ==, <, streamability"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk