Re: [boost] [function] new implementation

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] new implementation
From: Sebastian Redl (sebastian.redl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-04 06:16:13

On 04.11.2010 11:07, Domagoj Saric wrote:
>
> - integral constant expressions in static asserts (but so does Clang 
> and older GCCs)
> - RVO with classes that derive from boost::noncopyable (but so does 
> Clang and all GCCs)...

Have you filed bugs? RVO in Clang is not very advanced yet, but the ICE 
thing with static_asserts would be something we want to fix.

Sebastian