Subject: Re: [boost] [function] new implementation
From: Domagoj Saric (dsaritz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-05 17:54:17
"Lars Viklund" <zao_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> All tests that shall pass pass, and the two that shall fail fail on
> 5.9 and 5.10 with r66387 and r66395.
> vacpp results are surprisingly good on r66395, log attached. It fails
> just two tests unexpectedly, lib_function_test and function_n_test.
Ah, the dreaded 'ampersandless' plain function pointer assignment...this
wrecks havoc on most compilers (including latest MSVC and Clang)...
...I've pretty much refactored the relevant code...try the new version and
let me know if it helped...
ps. if you can, please also run tests for signals, signals2 and
program_options (these sometimes caught what the dedicated ones did not)...
-- "What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, spiritual devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than from one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate." Neil Postman
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk