Subject: Re: [boost] [function] new implementation
From: Domagoj Saric (dsaritz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-08 19:32:03
"Lars Viklund" <zao_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> r66407 has the correct pass/failed-as-expected results on VisualAge.
> All three test suites of program_options, signals and signals2 pass.
> I ran the same three suites on Sun as well, just to cover all bases.
> On 5.10, signals and signals2 pass completely, except for the usual
> spurious mutex_test failure as indicated in the regression matrix.
> program_options on 5.9 fails to compile parsers.o in a similar manner to
> the one reported in the regular trunk test matrix, so it's most probably
> not a Function fault (log attached).
If you are interested and have a project with relatively significant
boost::function usage I'd love to hear your results...the same advice/hints
I gave to Hartmut apply...
Additionally, if you would like to squeeze a little extra out of your
compilers you might want to provide the appropriate sections in the
detail/platform_specifics.hpp file ;)
ps. do you perhaps know where is the list of compilers officially supported
by Boost (I know I've seen it but can't remember the location)..?
-- "What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, spiritual devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than from one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate." Neil Postman
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk