Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] new implementation
From: Domagoj Saric (dsaritz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-08 19:32:03

"Lars Viklund" <zao_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> r66407 has the correct pass/failed-as-expected results on VisualAge.
> All three test suites of program_options, signals and signals2 pass.
> I ran the same three suites on Sun as well, just to cover all bases.
> On 5.10, signals and signals2 pass completely, except for the usual
> spurious mutex_test failure as indicated in the regression matrix.
> program_options on 5.9 fails to compile parsers.o in a similar manner to
> the one reported in the regular trunk test matrix, so it's most probably
> not a Function fault (log attached).
> Hooray!

Great! :-)

If you are interested and have a project with relatively significant
boost::function usage I'd love to hear your results...the same advice/hints
I gave to Hartmut apply...

Additionally, if you would like to squeeze a little extra out of your
compilers you might want to provide the appropriate sections in the
detail/platform_specifics.hpp file ;)

ps. do you perhaps know where is the list of compilers officially supported
by Boost (I know I've seen it but can't remember the location)..?

"What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, spiritual
devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than
from one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate."
Neil Postman 

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at