Re: [boost] [1.45] Release v trunk, as of r66483

Subject: Re: [boost] [1.45] Release v trunk, as of r66483
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-10 14:09:53

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Bell" <Jim_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 6:21 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [1.45] Release v trunk, as of r66483

> On 1:59 PM, vicente.botet wrote:
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Jim Bell" <Jim_at_[hidden]>
>> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 4:38 PM
>> Subject: [boost] [1.45] Release v trunk, as of r66483
>>
>>
>>> Here's a list of all differences between release and trunk, as of r66483
>>> (this morning).
>>>
>>> I won't slam the mailing list with its contents, so it's here instead:
>>>
>>>    http://jc-bell.com/files/release-v-trunk-r66483.csv
>>>
>>>
>>> Organized by Folder (2nd column), and it might have a stray false
>>> positive or negative since I apply a patch to test.
>>>
>> Have you take a look to the kind of differences you have found?
> 
> Most diffs (just eyeballing): mpl, config/test, date_time, random,
> ptr_container. Many others have some.
> 
> Also some stragglers -- diffs where the trunk's date is very old.
> Another indicator that something needs attention.
> 
> I'll leave those analyses as "exercises for the reader." ;-)

Hi,

it is not that I consider your report not useful, but you should add some flags that avoids signaling differences in lines as

// $Id: list20_c.cpp 49240 2008-10-10 09:21:07Z agurtovoy $
// $Date: 2008-10-10 11:21:07 +0200 (ven., 10 oct. 2008) $
// $Revision: 49240 $

Most of the mpl files include this kind of comments.

This was the kind of differences I requested you to look for.

Best,
Vicente