Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review ofProposed Boost.ChronoLibrary Starts TOMORROW
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-11 13:00:38
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]]
> On Behalf Of vicente.botet
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 5:25 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review ofProposed Boost.ChronoLibrary
> Starts TOMORROW
> > I have now...
> > #define BOOST_SYSTEM_INLINED
> > #define BOOST_CHRONO_INLINED
> > #include <boost/chrono/process_times.hpp>
> > #include <cmath>
> > produces the same output :-(
> > I am including boost/trunk and boost/sandbox/chrono
> > /Zi /nologo /W3 /WX- /Od /Oy- /D "WIN32" /D "_DEBUG" /D "_CONSOLE" /D
> > "_UNICODE" /D "UNICODE" /GF- /Gm /EHsc /RTC1 /GS /fp:precise /Za
> > /Zc:forScope /Fp"Debug\chrono_runtime.pch" /Fa"Debug\" /Fo"Debug\"
> > /Fd"Debug\vc100.pdb" /Gd /analyze- /errorReport:queue
> > Perhaps I need to build the library? Hopefully it won't hurt too much
> Have you replaced the Boost.System directory?
I've just updated the boost/sandbox/chrono/ directory.
It has a system folder
Do I have to do something else?
(I assumed - the mother of all foul-ups - that putting sandbox first in
include order would find any new version).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk