Subject: Re: [boost] Type traits extension & Bitfield reviews
From: joel falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-12 10:17:12
On 12/11/10 16:09, Edward Diener wrote:
> I have also been working on a type traits introspection library but it
> is not documented yet. I did get your files from you that are the
> "introspection.zip" in the Boost vault, which I have studied but I
> prefer the technique in the CTL which is a bit more flexible barring a
> VC++ ( and gcc prior to 4.0 ) bug on which I am working on a workaround.
Yup, introspecton was a ad hoc fit for a need I found out so it's
clearly not the proper way to do that.
> I also have looked at Frederick Bron's code in 'is_comparable.hpp'. It
> seems that should be fairly easily extended to other operators,
> although I may not understand all the issues involved.
Well,t hat was what mly macro set was trying to do
> My type traits introspection library is only interested in
> introspecting a type at compile time and is not interested in free
> functions. Nor does it touch on the operators work done by Frederick
> Bron, so I feel that should go forward on its own. Nonetheless I want
> to synchronize my efforts with others who are working in this area,
> probably offline.
As you wish, the free function detection is a compelte different matter
(as for the namespace inclusion check that I had at some point) but it
could be glad indeed to synchronize and try to gather up related
techniques like these.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk