Subject: Re: [boost] [trac] svn.boost.org slow
From: Wolfgang Forstmeier (wolfgang.forstmeier_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-18 07:28:14
I cannot confirm the thoughts of Fabio, we have an Trac version
internaly which just runs fine.
It is not as slow as that Trac installation of Boost is.
I guess that is maybe something with Webserver/Python installation or
an Plugin problem?!
-- On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Fabio Fracassi <f.fracassi_at_[hidden]> wrote: > On 18/11/2010 0:00, Marshall Clow wrote: >> >> On Nov 17, 2010, at 2:53 PM, Eric Niebler wrote: >>> >>> Having just executed a couple of queries and modified some trac tickets, >>> I can say that trac is still really slow. One of the queries even timed >>> out waiting for svn.boost.org to respond. I'd say there's still a >>> problem. Rene, anything you could do would be hugely appreciated. I'm >>> talking BIG karma in the afterlife. :-) >> >> >> What's the hardware underneath svn.boost.org? >> What else is that hardware doing? >> Can we upgrade the hw or move stuff off that box? >> > > Without knowing the exact setup, I don't believe that there is a load or > hardware problem, because in my experience trac (in general) is slow. We > have a recent server (with gbit ethernet, too) which does nothing but svn + > trac for 3-8 users, which is as slow as boosts trac. > > HTH > > Fabio > > _______________________________________________ > Unsubscribe & other changes: > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost > -- Mit freundlichen GrÃ¼Ãen, With best regards, Wolfgang Forstmeier Homines sumus nun dei (Petronius) ------------------------------------------- mailto:wolfgang.forstmeier_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk