Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review of IO and Toolbox extensions to Boost.GIL starts TOMORROW
From: Christian Henning (chhenning_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-06 10:08:44
> It would really help to have the documentation, though, and I guess that
> most potential reviewers have never built any documentation with boost
> build. Since the documentation is part of the review, I would even say that
> the availability of compiled documentation should be a requirement for
> And I assume that the task of building the documentation is very small
> compared to the task of writing it :-)
> Just my 2c.
Valid 2c. I'll look into it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk