Subject: Re: [boost] GIL io_new review
From: Phil Endecott (spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-13 11:02:02
Lubomir Bourdev wrote:
> I think the discussion here is not free functions vs classes
> but whether or not to maintain a state. Please note that both
> you and Christian use classes to maintain the state; Christian
> simply wraps the classes into free functions for simple things
> like read and write an entire image. But to do something more
> complicated, such as read the image in parts, one can simply
> build that functionality using the classes directly.
I've not noticed these classes and this functionality in Christian's
code; could you point out which code you're referring to?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk