Subject: Re: [boost] Provisional Boost.Generic and Boost.Auto_Function (concepts without concepts)
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-14 08:24:51
On 12/14/2010 7:11 AM, Matt Calabrese wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Dave Abrahams<dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> That said, if all the type difference occurs *within* the decltype
>> *and* within the decltype there are no ODR violations, I *think* there
>> is technically no ODR violation. But I suggest asking a real
>> hard-core core-language expert on this one if you care about technical
> This is what I'm currently banking on. I'll post to clc++ and see if anyone
> can shed some light here.
> This thread is a bit outdated with regards to the library now. I'll push the
> latest Boost.Generic and Boost.Auto_Function to the sandbox in the next
> couple of days.
I see Auto_Function in the sandbox but I do not see Generic. Is it there
under a different name ?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk