Re: [boost] GIL io_new review

Subject: Re: [boost] GIL io_new review
From: Domagoj Saric (domagoj.saric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-14 11:11:07

"Phil Endecott" <spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:1292111408233_at_dmwebmail.dmwebmail.chezphil.org...
> I'm curious to know what you get from CRTP that's not possible with this 
> sort of non-inheritance approach.

For example default implementations for some utility member functions and 
meta-functions...

But, this is probably the age old dilemma where to draw the boundary between 
free and member functions...to which I am open but just don't have the time 
for it right now...

-- 
"What Huxley teaches is that in the age of advanced technology, spiritual
devastation is more likely to come from an enemy with a smiling face than
from one whose countenance exudes suspicion and hate."
Neil Postman