Subject: Re: [boost] [gil][io_ew] performance test
From: Christian Henning (chhenning_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-15 18:46:41
Hi there, I did a little update to include more files. Now I have
26580 jpeg files distributed over 10 folders. I also tried to reduce
the number of image memory allocation by reusing the same image over
and over again. The new code can be found here:
I run each backend three times. Here are the results:
1. 30.975 sec
2. 29.894 sec
3. 25.595 sec
1. 33.086 sec
2. 28.223 sec
3. 28.867 sec
So far, I have changed any code inside my backend ( io_new ). The next
step is to profile.
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Christian Henning <chhenning_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi there, I did a little performance test of io_new vs io2. The code
> is here. http://pastebin.com/eCeFZuMS
> On my machine io_new runs in 1.15sec for 2658 jpegs. IO2 run in 1.005sec.
> All jpegs are the same image but they are a different file. This way
> I'm sure I don't have to convert the image into a different color
> space. I did that since io2 doesn't support any_image, I believe.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk