Subject: Re: [boost] [Config] Macro for C++0x range-based for
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-17 08:14:35
>I believe it will be useful. For example, BOOST_FOREACH can be
>implemented in terms of built-in range-based for if it's available.
OK, but what I'm missing here is a boost-library author saying "I want to
use this for X", or to put it another way, we don't add new macros just
because we can - as there are too many of the things already!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk