Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Respecting a projects toolchain decisions (was Re: [context] new version - support for Win64)
From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-29 05:56:16


On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> At Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:56:19 +0800,
> Dean Michael Berris wrote:
>>
>> Actually, I'd +2 if you said a review should be open until the library
>> gets into the main distribution. And even after that, reviewing the
>> quality of the library should be on-going and shouldn't stop at the
>> point of inclusion into Boost. ;)
>
> _That_ is a really cool idea.

I liked too. How many times I wanted to review a library, but didn't
find any time in the two or three weeks they were being reviewed.
Sometimes these libraries are in the review queue for much longer
than that, and a review could've been possible before or even after.

> --
> Dave Abrahams
> BoostPro Computing
> http://www.boostpro.com

Regards,

-- 
Felipe Magno de Almeida

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk