Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Respecting a projects toolchain decisions (was Re: [context] new version - support for Win64)
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-12-29 12:58:15

Stewart, Robert wrote:
> Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Dave Abrahams
>> <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> At Wed, 29 Dec 2010 10:56:19 +0800,
>>> Dean Michael Berris wrote:
>>>> Actually, I'd +2 if you said a review should be open until the
>>>> library gets into the main distribution. And even after that,
>>>> reviewing the quality of the library should be on-going and
>>>> shouldn't stop at the point of inclusion into Boost. ;)
>>> _That_ is a really cool idea.

I had a lot to say about the review process at BoostCon 2010. It seemed
pretty similar to the ideas touched upon in the thread and seemed generally
well received. I haven't seen any efforts to implement any of the ideas yet

Robert Ramey

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at