Subject: Re: [boost] [system][chrono] header-only libs
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-02 20:56:49
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 12:24 PM, vicente.botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I would like to know if you are yet interesteed on the header only version for Boost.System.
I'm interested in the concept, but we would need to do a lot better
that the code in the sandbox:
Much of boost/system/detail/inlined/error_code.hpp code duplicates
libs/system/src/error_code.cpp code. That isn't acceptable since it
would create a maintenance nightmare. Code for each component needs to
be defined in a single file, with macro magic to abstract away the
difference between the library. Having to do every maintenance fix in
two places isn't practical - the code will certainly diverge over
The test framework also needs more work. Testing only the inlined
version doesn't give enough confidence the library version works OK.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk